anotherhue a day ago I often raise this point, but it bears repeating.> Interesting to note that the Mozilla CEO earned nearly as much ($5.6 M) as Mozilla received in donations ($7 M).Baker did a CHM oral history some time ago, some of it is interesting, most of it is like deposing a lawyer.https://youtu.be/EqW2rg0boKk?feature=shared
chihwei a day ago I hope Mozilla can invest more in open source technology rather than political stuff.
theandrewbailey a day ago (2022) CommenterPerson a day ago The post says August 2023. Still way worth a read. Seems like an outright shady organization and paid for by g**gle.Changed to DuckDuckGo two years ago happy with it so far. tokai a day ago "This article was originally published in December of 2022, exclusively for subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. It is being re-published now" snvzz a day ago Particularly relevant now, considering recent Mozilla's events.
CommenterPerson a day ago The post says August 2023. Still way worth a read. Seems like an outright shady organization and paid for by g**gle.Changed to DuckDuckGo two years ago happy with it so far. tokai a day ago "This article was originally published in December of 2022, exclusively for subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. It is being re-published now"
tokai a day ago "This article was originally published in December of 2022, exclusively for subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. It is being re-published now"
snvzz a day ago Interesting.That's a lot of money, and quite dubious use.IANAL, but I can't help but wonder if the use of blatant lies to gather donations might constitute fraud.
neoromantique a day ago [flagged] microsoftedging a day ago Hm? Completely out of the loop concerning this guy. Explanation please? mos87 a day ago Triggers most of the wrong people. You know, those that aren't even mentioned by someone him in this case but are still offended like they're being tortured. THat sort. zihotki a day ago Check earlier submissions of this article, they have a lot of good discussions microsoftedging a day ago Will do, thanks! snvzz a day ago Best to form your own opinion.e.g. What are the facts, and who is trying to suppress them / why. pixxel a day ago [dead] mos87 a day ago why do you do this
microsoftedging a day ago Hm? Completely out of the loop concerning this guy. Explanation please? mos87 a day ago Triggers most of the wrong people. You know, those that aren't even mentioned by someone him in this case but are still offended like they're being tortured. THat sort. zihotki a day ago Check earlier submissions of this article, they have a lot of good discussions microsoftedging a day ago Will do, thanks! snvzz a day ago Best to form your own opinion.e.g. What are the facts, and who is trying to suppress them / why. pixxel a day ago [dead]
mos87 a day ago Triggers most of the wrong people. You know, those that aren't even mentioned by someone him in this case but are still offended like they're being tortured. THat sort.
zihotki a day ago Check earlier submissions of this article, they have a lot of good discussions microsoftedging a day ago Will do, thanks!
snvzz a day ago Best to form your own opinion.e.g. What are the facts, and who is trying to suppress them / why.
I often raise this point, but it bears repeating.
> Interesting to note that the Mozilla CEO earned nearly as much ($5.6 M) as Mozilla received in donations ($7 M).
Baker did a CHM oral history some time ago, some of it is interesting, most of it is like deposing a lawyer.
https://youtu.be/EqW2rg0boKk?feature=shared
I hope Mozilla can invest more in open source technology rather than political stuff.
(2022)
The post says August 2023. Still way worth a read. Seems like an outright shady organization and paid for by g**gle.
Changed to DuckDuckGo two years ago happy with it so far.
"This article was originally published in December of 2022, exclusively for subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. It is being re-published now"
Particularly relevant now, considering recent Mozilla's events.
Interesting.
That's a lot of money, and quite dubious use.
IANAL, but I can't help but wonder if the use of blatant lies to gather donations might constitute fraud.
[flagged]
Hm? Completely out of the loop concerning this guy. Explanation please?
Triggers most of the wrong people. You know, those that aren't even mentioned by someone him in this case but are still offended like they're being tortured. THat sort.
Check earlier submissions of this article, they have a lot of good discussions
Will do, thanks!
Best to form your own opinion.
e.g. What are the facts, and who is trying to suppress them / why.
[dead]
why do you do this